The Enlightened Fish. Humility: the Trademark of Greatness
"What is the use of a
well,
If water is there all the time,
Having cut craving at the root,
In search of what should one
wander?"
(Udapānasutta, 79)
(Udapānasutta, 79)
An awakened fish gets
up one morning totally transfigured and shows-up with a peacefully and radiant
face among his friends and lets them know that he has simply become aware of
water.
“Our most intimate aspect, our essential nature
is water”, he says.
But when he tries to explain what actually could had happened to him, this awareness of a pre-existent reality becomes a doctrine of some kind. It translates to other fish as a path full of various disciplines, austerities and commandments towards a goal which is the realization of the one water which all the fish are immersed in.
To a thinking fish the enlightenment will only make sense in terms of “goals” and “achievements".
But when he tries to explain what actually could had happened to him, this awareness of a pre-existent reality becomes a doctrine of some kind. It translates to other fish as a path full of various disciplines, austerities and commandments towards a goal which is the realization of the one water which all the fish are immersed in.
To a thinking fish the enlightenment will only make sense in terms of “goals” and “achievements".
An enlightened
fish is a fish aware of the all-pervading water. The nature of fish is water in
the same way in which the nature of humans in self-consciousness.
However, there
will always be some guru-fish who will write interesting books for
water-seeking fish, some books like "How
to achieve water in 7 steps". Not all of them are fake. Some of them
are just using metaphors as pointers - words that are transparent to
transcendence, which, paradoxically, is here and now. There is ,however, a demand
on the market of awakening and that
demand should be addressed properly, in accordance with the level of
understanding of the seeker-fish. The always-seeking minds of fish, asking
questions all the time, will get some answers like this:
“you must achieve water",
"you must acquire water",
"you must possess water",
"you must become one with water".
This is how a
spiritual teaching would sound like in a language of fish.
We see the waves
of the ocean in contradiction with the ocean itself and in the same way, we
perceive the colors of the rainbow as contradictory with the white light.
The “fish in water” is a complex, that is,
a psychological condition. Although it is just a way of putting it and a figure
of speech, a pointer meant to express a common state of “normality” or
“comfort”, it’s not a proper attitude in case of human beings.
We are spiritually unconscious or, in Buddhist terms, asleep and this seems to be some kind of normality, but I think the actual normality of humans is to wake up and to be aware of both their environment and the awareness itself. A fish in water is not aware of the water - this is a normal attitude in fish, but not in humans.
Ignoring water can inflict no harm to a fish. Naturally and unconsciously floating underwater is in accord with its’ intimate nature, but a “fish in water” attitude is the real danger of a battlefield of life for a human “warrior”, whose mind gets entangled in the turmoil, unaware of the battle, unaware of the still canvas on which the picture of battle is painted, unaware of the fact that he is the canvas on a deeper level and only on the surface he is the participant in a battle. He is trapped, no longer capable of being aware of his environment and incapable of evaluating the suffering he inflicts on others and on himself. Losing the witness perspective is that what defines all human suffering.
We are spiritually unconscious or, in Buddhist terms, asleep and this seems to be some kind of normality, but I think the actual normality of humans is to wake up and to be aware of both their environment and the awareness itself. A fish in water is not aware of the water - this is a normal attitude in fish, but not in humans.
Ignoring water can inflict no harm to a fish. Naturally and unconsciously floating underwater is in accord with its’ intimate nature, but a “fish in water” attitude is the real danger of a battlefield of life for a human “warrior”, whose mind gets entangled in the turmoil, unaware of the battle, unaware of the still canvas on which the picture of battle is painted, unaware of the fact that he is the canvas on a deeper level and only on the surface he is the participant in a battle. He is trapped, no longer capable of being aware of his environment and incapable of evaluating the suffering he inflicts on others and on himself. Losing the witness perspective is that what defines all human suffering.
The “fish in
water” perspective prevents you from evolving, spiritually speaking. The “fish
in water” perspective belongs, naturally, exclusively to fish.
But, for the sake
of this simile, let’s go on supposing that there are enlightened fish and that
they can talk… The enlightened fish, while remaining a fish, undergoes only a
shift in consciousness. The fish that has “achieved” Enlightenment will regard it so naturally and harmoniously
ordinary, that it will barely try to be convincing. In the realm of the
spirituality, humility is the trademark of the greatness. When in search for a
real master, you should first pay attention to how much he/she struggles to be
convincing.
We can recognize an "awakened" fish in the first place by his lack of eagerness and lack of interest in being very convincing, in attracting followers. From the perspective of the awakened fish, the all-pervading water is so normal, that it will not be very eager to argue and to be convincing. An awakened fish would accept to share, somehow, his insights, out of compassion for other fish, but he will never try to thrust the teachings in their throats.
We can recognize an "awakened" fish in the first place by his lack of eagerness and lack of interest in being very convincing, in attracting followers. From the perspective of the awakened fish, the all-pervading water is so normal, that it will not be very eager to argue and to be convincing. An awakened fish would accept to share, somehow, his insights, out of compassion for other fish, but he will never try to thrust the teachings in their throats.
You will recognize
an enlightened fish from the very fact that it will be less vocal and
militant in his approach than other “spiritual”
fish, because the latter are not very sure if there is still some water left to
be achieved or not:) The vocal fish are very eager to convince you that you
must acquire water, at any costs and not in your own way, but with their
precious help.
Labels: Buddha Datu, Buddha Dhatu, Buddha Nature, Buddhism, religious metaphors, spirituality, Zen